Dmitry Bivol Faces Criticism Over Trilogy Bout with Artur Beterbiev
The trilogy bout between Bivol and Beterbiev will be a highly anticipated event, with both fighters having already shown their skills in two previous razor-thin majority decisions, and the outcome is far from certain, making it a must-watch for boxing fans.
Dmitry Bivol's decision to pursue a trilogy bout with Artur Beterbiev has sparked criticism, with some accusing him of "ducking" a fight with David Benavidez, but boxing columnist Matt Richardson defends the move as a legitimate choice to settle the rivalry.
Bivol and Beterbiev have already fought twice, with each man winning a razor-thin majority decision, and Richardson argues that the trilogy would be a huge event, with Bivol having already made a significant amount of money fighting Beterbiev. He also notes that Beterbiev is running out of time, being 40 in October, while Benavidez is only 28 and just coming into his prime.
Bivol's decision to vacate his WBC light heavyweight title and refuse to face Benavidez in a highly anticipated fight has left Benavidez without a title shot, and the WBC will now have to find a new opponent for him. The WBC has confirmed Benavidez as the new champion, and the organization will decide on a new opponent for him, with potential opponents including Morrell.
Ultimately, Richardson concludes that the decision to fight Beterbiev again is a good one, and that the fans can't lose however the situation plays out, as the trilogy bout between Bivol and Beterbiev promises to be an exciting and highly anticipated event.