Prasanna Sankar Embroiled in Bitter Divorce Battle
The allegations and counter-allegations in the Prasanna Sankar divorce case have sparked a wider conversation about the challenges of navigating complex family disputes, particularly when they involve high-profile individuals and sensitive allegations. As the case continues to unfold, it is likely to shed further light on the importance of fairness, respect, and transparency in family law proceedings.
Rippling co-founder Prasanna Sankar is in the midst of a highly publicized and contentious divorce and custody battle with his wife Dhivya Sashidhar, with both parties exchanging serious allegations on social media platform X, including claims of rape, kidnapping, and financial impropriety.
Prasanna Sankar claims that his wife filed false police complaints against him, alleging physical abuse and rape, which were subsequently cleared by the Singapore police. However, Dhivya Sashidhar alleges that Prasanna sexually harassed her, recorded and distributed explicit videos of her, and illegally transferred her wealth to his father in Chennai, violating US and Indian tax laws.
The custody battle over their nine-year-old son has also led to allegations of kidnapping, with Dhivya claiming that Prasanna's friend Gokul kidnapped the child, while Prasanna claims that Dhivya willingly handed the child over to Gokul. The Chennai police are currently investigating these allegations, and have released Gokul after detaining him in connection with the kidnapping complaint.
Prasanna Sankar has denied all allegations, sharing WhatsApp screenshots and email exchanges between their lawyers to support his claims, and accusing Dhivya of making false allegations and brainwashing their son against him. The dispute has sparked a heated public debate, with both parties using social media to air their grievances and allegations.
As the custody battle and divorce proceedings continue, it remains to be seen how the allegations and counter-allegations will be resolved, and what the ultimate outcome will be for the couple and their son. The case has raised important questions about the use of social media in high-profile divorce cases, and the need for a more nuanced and respectful approach to resolving family disputes.